Research library

Equity, credit and transaction research.

Research by Dave Daulagupu at Riverson Arc, covering Venture Global debt and liquidity, ExxonMobil and Chevron valuation, and Santander’s acquisition of Webster. All three currently published reports are unsponsored. Each identifies its financial cutoff, sources, assumptions and risks.

Unsponsored Research

Unsponsored Research

Research initiated by Riverson Arc without payment from the covered issuer. This describes all three reports currently in the library.

Issuer-Sponsored Research

Research paid for by the covered company, with sponsorship and relevant conflicts disclosed and editorial control retained by Riverson Arc. No sponsored coverage has been initiated.

View coverage universe

Published research

Notes 001–003

3 publications · 57 pages · Follow via RSS

Cover of Venture Global: Credit, Liquidity and Funding, Part 1
Unsponsored ResearchLNGCredit researchPart 1

Venture Global (VG)

Credit, Liquidity and Funding

Publication date
September 23, 2026
Financial basis
June 30, 2026 balances; H1 2026 results
Scope
Credit, liquidity and project debt service

Funding is available, but the credit case still depends on execution. Construction needs, cash-transfer restrictions and legal exposure limit the comfort provided by headline liquidity and operating cash generation.

Cover of the Santander and Webster post-close transaction review
Unsponsored ResearchU.S. bankingTransaction analysisPost-close review

Santander / Webster

Strategic fit, valuation, and the earnings bridge

Updated publication
September 8, 2026
Research origin
April 2026 merger analysis
Status
Post-close transaction case study; not live coverage

Santander acquired a strategically attractive U.S. franchise at a full but supportable valuation. The publicly disclosed economics support roughly 4–5% 2028 EPS accretion versus management's 7–8% guidance, leaving an earnings bridge that still needs to be proven.

Cover of the XOM versus CVX comparative research note
Unsponsored ResearchIntegrated energyComparative analysisArchive

ExxonMobil vs. Chevron

Quality, cash conversion, valuation, and risk

Publication date
December 1, 2025
Financial base
FY2024 statements
Status
Original research archive; not live coverage

The historical preference for ExxonMobil rested on stronger three-year return efficiency, lower capital intensity, and better post-investment cash conversion. Chevron offered the higher archived dividend yield and stronger vendor growth path.

Archive policy: company-specific facts, forecasts, reference prices, and conclusions remain fixed to the stated research cutoff unless a later update is explicitly published.