Strategic and valuation review
Assessment of what the buyer is acquiring, how the consideration compares with trading references and precedent deals, and which strategic benefits are measurable.
Transaction research and M&A analysis
Independent, public-source analysis of announced and completed transactions, including strategic fit, valuation, accretion or dilution, purchase accounting, and post-close monitoring.
The mandate
Transaction announcements compress strategy, financing, accounting, and execution risk into a small set of headline claims. Riverson Arc expands those claims into an auditable framework for public-market investors.
The work distinguishes company-disclosed terms and guidance from Riverson Arc calculations and assumptions. Unquantified synergies are identified as possible bridge items, not treated as value already earned.
Discuss a research mandateHow we can help
The scope begins with the decision, the evidence required, and the analytical output your team can use.
Assessment of what the buyer is acquiring, how the consideration compares with trading references and precedent deals, and which strategic benefits are measurable.
Earnings bridges, share issuance, synergies, financing effects, purchase-accounting considerations, tangible-book dilution, and sensitivity analysis where supported.
A scorecard for cost savings, revenue or funding benefits, integration costs, franchise retention, capital, purchase accounting, and the disclosures still needed to prove the case.
Typical outputs
Headline terms, ownership, consideration, timeline, strategic rationale, and key management guidance.
Trading references, precedent transactions, premium analysis, and transparent weighting or sensitivity.
Step-by-step accretion or dilution analysis with company figures, assumptions, and model outputs classified.
The evidence, thresholds, and future disclosures that can confirm or disconfirm the transaction thesis.
Working process
Map announcement materials, filings, proxy information, closing disclosures, and the timing of each material transaction input.
Translate consideration, financing, synergies, accounting, and standalone earnings into valuation and per-share outcomes.
Reconcile modeled outputs with management guidance and identify which benefits, costs, or forecast differences require future evidence.
Frequently asked questions
It examines how a transaction changes per-share earnings under stated assumptions for consideration, financing, standalone earnings, synergies and purchase accounting. Riverson Arc separates management guidance from its own calculations and tests the assumptions needed to reconcile them.
The service can cover announced or completed public-company mergers and acquisitions, strategic investments, major asset transactions, and other special situations where public disclosures support a useful analytical screen.
Yes. Precedent deals can be used when the transaction set is sufficiently comparable. The analysis identifies differences in timing, business mix, market conditions, and transaction structure rather than treating every precedent as equivalent.
Quantified company guidance is separated from Riverson Arc assumptions and outputs. Potential benefits that have not been publicly quantified may be discussed as bridge items but are not assigned value without a stated analytical basis.
No. Riverson Arc transaction research is a public-source analytical screen and decision-support product. It is not a fairness opinion, legal or accounting advice, or a live merger-arbitrage recommendation.
Proof of process
The Santander and Webster case study examines the strategic assets acquired, the price paid, valuation sensitivities, 2028 EPS accretion, tangible-book dilution, preliminary purchase accounting, and the remaining earnings bridge.
Start with the question
Include the company, transaction, or decision context and the output required. Scope and timing are agreed before work begins.